Identifying Influential Factors and Designing a Knowledge Management Model with a Human Resource Empowerment Approach in Bank Sepah

Authors

    Mohammad Jalalvand Department of Management, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
    Sedigheh Tootian Isfahani * Department of Management, WT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran s.tootian@iau.ac.ir
    Rostam Derakhshan Department of Management, Ramh.C., Islamic Azad University, Ramhormoz, Iran
    Ahmadreza Esmaeili Assistant Professor, Department of Human Resource Management, Amin University of Police Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Knowledge Management, Human Resource Empowerment, Bank Sepah, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM), Thematic Analysis, Human Capital, Institutional Context

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the influential factors and develop a knowledge management model with a human resource empowerment approach in Bank Sepah while explaining the relationships among knowledge management, empowerment, and human capital outcomes within the institutional and structural context of Iran’s banking system. This applied mixed-methods study employed both qualitative and quantitative approaches. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 academic and professional banking experts selected through theoretical sampling. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis in MAXQDA, resulting in 326 initial codes, 21 sub-themes, four main themes (knowledge management system, empowering organizational platforms, human resource empowerment, and human capital outcomes), and one contextual theme (institutional and structural context of Iran’s banking system). Subsequently, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) was used to determine the hierarchical relationships among the identified themes. In the quantitative phase, nine hypotheses were tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to validate the proposed model. The ISM results revealed that the institutional and structural context of Iran’s banking system represents the most fundamental driving factor influencing all other dimensions of the model, while the knowledge management system serves as the primary operational driver shaping empowering organizational platforms. Structural equation modeling confirmed that the knowledge management system has significant positive effects on both empowering organizational platforms and human resource empowerment. Empowering organizational platforms significantly enhance human resource empowerment, which in turn positively influences strategic human capital outcomes. The mediating role of organizational platforms in the relationship between knowledge management and empowerment, as well as the mediating role of empowerment in linking knowledge management to human capital outcomes, was confirmed. Furthermore, the institutional and structural context of Iran’s banking system significantly moderated the relationships among knowledge management, organizational platforms, empowerment, and human capital outcomes. The findings indicate that knowledge management can contribute to sustainable performance improvement and competitive advantage in Bank Sepah only when implemented through an integrated framework consisting of empowering organizational platforms and comprehensive human resource empowerment processes. Moreover, consideration of institutional and structural constraints within Iran’s banking system is essential for the successful implementation of knowledge management and human capital development initiatives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asropi, A., Daniati, A., & Ulfa, M. (2022). Collaborative Governance Model in Indonesian Innovation Startup Program: The MASKIT Startup Case Study. Dia. https://doi.org/10.30996/dia.v20i01.6350

Bourceret, A., Amblard, L., & Mathias, J. D. (2021). Governance in Social-Ecological Agent-Based Models: A Review. Ecology and Society, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12440-260238

Bours, S. A., Wanzenböck, I., & Frenken, K. (2022). Small Wins for Grand Challenges.

Cefis, E., & Scrofani, S. (2025). European National Innovation Policies: A Review of Policy Designs and Scopes. In Technological Evolution: How Innovations are Changing our Future (pp. 41-65). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-85814-7_3

Dworak, E., & Grzelak, M. M. (2023). The Innovation Gap of National Innovation Systems in the European Union. Comparative Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.26.01

Ebrahimian, B., Taheri, A., Rezaei, S. A., Miri, M., & Mohtadi, M. M. (2024). Designing a Multi-Level Governance Model in Complex Organizations Based on Grounded Theory and Meta-Synthesis. Governance and Development, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.22111/jipaa.2024.469770.1177

Farazmand, A. (2023). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66252-3

Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Grybauskas, A., Vilkas, M., & Petraitė, M. (2021). Industry 4.0, Innovation, and Sustainable Development: A Systematic Review and a Roadmap to Sustainable Innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 4237-4257. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2867

Herrero, M., Thornton, P. K., Mason-D'Croz, D., Palmer, J., Bodirsky, B. L., Pradhan, P., & Rockström, J. (2021). Articulating the Effect of Food Systems Innovation on the Sustainable Development Goals. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(1), e50-e62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30277-1

Hushko, S., Solovieva, V., Shaikan, A., Khvostina, I., & Semerikov, S. (2021). On the Way to Novelty - Society of Ambient Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1051/SHSCONF/202110000001

Jason, L. A., Salomon-Amend, M., Guerrero, M., Bobak, T., O'Brien, J., & Soto-Nevarez, A. (2021). The Emergence, Role, and Impact of Recovery Support Services. Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 41(1). https://doi.org/10.35946/arcr.v41.1.04

Karaca, Z., Daştan, H., & Çalmaşur, G. (2021). Relation of Company and Innovation in National Innovation System. In. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6811-8_12

Lundvall, B. A. (2022). National Systems of Innovation. In Chapters (pp. 350-357). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106996.00048

Mtar, K., & Belazreg, W. (2021). Causal Nexus between Innovation, Financial Development, and Economic Growth: The Case of OECD Countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(1), 310-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00628-2

Oh, H., & Yi, C. G. (2022). Development of Innovation Studies in Korea from the Perspective of the National Innovation System. Sustainability, 14(3), 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031752

Pavlov, V. P., Shtuler, I., Gerasymchuk, N., Mirzoieva, T., Lisovyi, A., & Kucher, I. (2022). Concept of National Innovation System: Etymologization and Complications of Management. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-5/191

Roh, T., Lee, K., & Yang, J. Y. (2021). How Do Intellectual Property Rights and Government Support Drive a Firm's Green Innovation? The Mediating Role of Open Innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 317, 128422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128422

Singh, H. (2022). National Innovation Systems: What the National Technology Initiative Brings to Türkiye. In. https://doi.org/10.53478/TUBA.978-625-8352-17-7.ch05

Sube, K., Belay, T., Hando, F., & Bayinesagn, A. (2025). National Innovation System (NIS) as a Means for Development: Policies, Opportunities, and Challenges in Ethiopia. F1000research, 14, 34. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.159772.2

Torabandeh, M. A., Dorri, B., Rabieh, M., & Motameni, A. R. (2023). Designing a Multi-Division Model of National Innovation Capability Promotion Based on Social Network Analysis. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 14(2), 386-418. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-01-2021-0006

Wang, F., Harindintwali, J. D., Wei, K., Shan, Y., Mi, Z., Costello, M. J., & Tiedje, J. M. (2023). Climate Change: Strategies for Mitigation and Adaptation. The Innovation Geoscience, 1(1), 100015-100061. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-geo.2023.100015

Wang, H., & Ran, B. (2023). Network Governance and Collaborative Governance: A Thematic Analysis on Their Similarities, Differences, and Entanglements. Public Management Review, 25(6), 1187-1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2011389

Yin, X., Chen, J., & Li, J. (2022). Rural Innovation System: Revitalize the Countryside for a Sustainable Development. Journal of Rural Studies, 93, 471-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.014

Zhui, L., Fang, Y., Wang, M., Chen, H., Zhang, Q., Huang, W., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of 68 Patients with Spontaneous Iliac Vein Rupture: A Case Report and Systematic Review. Heliyon, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16382

Downloads

Published

2026-12-22

Submitted

2026-02-09

Revised

2026-05-29

Accepted

2026-06-06

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Jalalvand, M. ., Tootian Isfahani, S., Derakhshan, R. ., & Esmaeili, A. (1405). Identifying Influential Factors and Designing a Knowledge Management Model with a Human Resource Empowerment Approach in Bank Sepah. Journal of Personal Development and Organizational Transformation, 1-27. https://journalpdot.com/index.php/jpdot/article/view/329

Similar Articles

1-10 of 200

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.